The possibility that global warming will trigger abrupt climate change is something people might not want to think about. But University of Arizona astronomer Roger Angel thinks about it. Angel, a University of Arizona Regents' Professor and one of the world's foremost minds in modern optics, directs the Steward Observatory Mirror Laboratory and the Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics. He has won top honors for his many extraordinary conceptual ideas that have become practical engineering solutions for astronomy. Angel is now publishing a first detailed, scholarly paper, "Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near L1," in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The plan would be to launch a constellation of trillions of small free-flying spacecraft a million miles above Earth into an orbit aligned with the sun, called the L-1 orbit. The spacecraft would form a long, cylindrical cloud with a diameter about half that of Earth, and about 10 times longer. About 10 percent of the sunlight passing through the 60,000-mile length of the cloud, pointing lengthwise between the Earth and the sun, would be diverted away from our planet. The effect would be to uniformly reduce sunlight by about 2 percent over the entire planet, enough to balance the heating of a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere. The total mass of all the fliers making up the space sunshade structure would be 20 million tons. At $10,000 a pound, conventional chemical rocket launch is prohibitively expensive. Angel proposes using a cheaper way developed by Sandia National Laboratories for electromagnetic space launches, which could bring cost down to as little as $20 a pound. The sunshade could be deployed by a total 20 electromagnetic launchers launching a stack of flyers every 5 minutes for 10 years. The electromagnetic launchers would ideally run on hydroelectric power, but even in the worst-case environmental scenario with coal-generated electricity, each ton of carbon used to make electricity would mitigate the effect of 1000 tons of atmospheric carbon. Once propelled beyond Earth's atmosphere and gravity with electromagnetic launchers, the flyer stacks would be steered to L-1 orbit by solar-powered ion propulsion, a new method proven in space by the European Space Agency's SMART-1 moon orbiter and NASA's Deep Space 1 probe. "The concept builds on existing technologies," Angel said. "It seems feasible that it could be developed and deployed in about 25 years at a cost of a few trillion dollars. With care, the solar shade should last about 50 years. So the average cost is about $100 billion a year, or about two-tenths of one percent of the global domestic product." He added, "The sunshade is no substitute for developing renewable energy, the only permanent solution. A similar massive level of technological innovation and financial investment could ensure that. "But if the planet gets into an abrupt climate crisis that can only be fixed by cooling, it would be good to be ready with some shading solutions that have been worked out."
I don't know, wouldn't it make more sense to use the technology we already have at our disposal (such as electric vehicles, bioplastics, etc), and just stop destroying the earth than to implement some overly elaborate scheme (that is really just more pollution) that enables us to be more comfortable destroying the earth?
Even if we can manage to block out some of the Sun's energy (and really, IS that such a good thing?), if we keep doing what we're doing, we'll still kill the planet, it'll just be a little less hot while we do it.
--
The land belongs to only those who cultivate it with their own hands ~ Mikhail Bakunin
The plundering of the human spirit by the market place is paralleled by the plundering of the earth by capital ~ Murray Bookchin
But not enough people would like to admit the existence of global warming.
...Or switch to electric vehicles.
--
"...I wouldn’t necessarily consider a gap in logic within the mind of a psychotic serial killer a plot hole. That’s like critiquing the grammar of someone who writes on the walls in an insane asylum." -Peter Hall
Given the choice between the easy thing and the right thing, the majority of people will choose to do the easy thing. Sometimes I think it would be better if we DO keep on the path we're on so we'll just end up extinct. Then maybe the earth could revitalize itself back to the perfectly balanced thing of beauty it was before we started messing with it.
--
The land belongs to only those who cultivate it with their own hands ~ Mikhail Bakunin
The plundering of the human spirit by the market place is paralleled by the plundering of the earth by capital ~ Murray Bookchin
heaps good
--
R.I.P ~L11ll3
Even if we can manage to block out some of the Sun's energy (and really, IS that such a good thing?), if we keep doing what we're doing, we'll still kill the planet, it'll just be a little less hot while we do it.
--
The land belongs to only those who cultivate it with their own hands ~ Mikhail Bakunin
The plundering of the human spirit by the market place is paralleled by the plundering of the earth by capital ~ Murray Bookchin
...Or switch to electric vehicles.
--
"...I wouldn’t necessarily consider a gap in logic within the mind of a psychotic serial killer a plot hole. That’s like critiquing the grammar of someone who writes on the walls in an insane asylum." -Peter Hall
You buttered your bread, now sleep in it.
--
The land belongs to only those who cultivate it with their own hands ~ Mikhail Bakunin
The plundering of the human spirit by the market place is paralleled by the plundering of the earth by capital ~ Murray Bookchin